The November 2024 SAT exam introduced unique challenges, particularly in Math Module 2 and with vocabulary in Reading/Writing sections. Discover the insights and preparation strategies for future exams.
The November 2, 2024 SAT has left many test-takers buzzing with mixed emotions. From the vocabulary in the reading section to complex math problems, students shared both their frustrations and triumphs, offering insights into one of the more challenging SAT administrations in recent memory.
The main sentiment emerging from students was that the exam was a blend of expected SAT content with some surprisingly complex twists. While some found the Reading and Writing modules manageable, the Math modules, particularly Module 2, were challenging. This adaptive format, which gives students progressively harder questions if they perform well in initial modules, made predicting scores and managing time difficult for many.
Vocabulary questions sparked some of the liveliest discussion. Words like "palpable," "corroborate," "continuity," and "irrefutable" came up as tricky choices, leading to debate on their correct context.
Many felt that while vocabulary was familiar, some words were used in unfamiliar contexts (this is why the vocabulary questions are called Words in Context). Passages covered a broad range of topics, including Mayan civilization, theater etiquette, and scientific studies about UV absorption in chimpanzees. A few passages seemed to resemble those from prior SATs but featured new questions, leading some to wonder if the College Board was recycling material with fresh twists.
The English modules were considered somewhat straightforward, though not without their challenges. Fewer vocabulary questions allowed for a greater focus on structure, grammar, and context.
For many, the most challenging questions involved transitions, where selecting the best word or phrase to logically complete a sentence was more complex than anticipated.
Despite the familiar format, students noted that the test required close reading and interpretation, especially with the subtle differences in answer choices. Many students who practiced actively managing their time found this approach helpful, while others felt the need to slow down and re-read to capture details they might have missed initially.
Math Module 2 was perceived as challenging, with many noting questions that they hadn’t encountered in practice tests. Topics included polynomial factors, triangle congruency, percentages, and geometry.
There were also questions related to experimental design, which some students suspected might be experimental questions. In one case, students were asked to design an experiment to assess customer preference between different branding strategies. Test-takers speculated on whether these types of questions were being tested by the College Board for future SAT administrations.
Many students found that managing time effectively was key to navigating this SAT. The reading passages, although shorter, often contained intricate arguments that took time to interpret. Those who had practiced skimming and answering selectively felt more prepared, but some were surprised by the emphasis on careful reading to catch minor details.
Math Module 2’s complexity made timing difficult for many students. Multiple students admitted guessing on the last few questions due to time constraints. A few noted that missing these final questions might not significantly impact their scores, referencing anecdotes about high scorers who missed the last few questions but still achieved competitive results. For others, the shift in difficulty between the two math modules led to confusion on the expected score range.
A recurring topic was the potential inclusion of experimental questions, especially in the math section. Students noted several questions that seemed unusually difficult or unrelated to typical SAT content. Examples included questions on experimental design, such as setting up control and treatment groups and assessing consumer product choices.
Some students theorized that the College Board is testing these questions for future SATs, noting that questions on the digital SAT appear to be evolving. The presence of these questions led to anxiety for some, as they were unsure which questions counted toward their score and which didn’t. Nonetheless, test-takers generally appreciated the variety, seeing it as a way to stay engaged, despite the added difficulty.
A common thread was the worry over scoring. Many students posted their expected raw scores for each module and asked for predictions on their final scaled scores. The SAT’s adaptive nature, where students receive harder questions after performing well in initial modules, left some confused about how their performance would translate into a final score. This uncertainty led to speculation, with students attempting to gauge where they stood compared to others who had a similar experience.
One notable point was the reassurance among students that the College Board doesn’t penalize them directly for questions most people struggle with. Some speculated that the College Board might omit questions that prove overly difficult, though official policies on this remain unconfirmed.
For those looking to improve their SAT scores, a few key strategies can help:
Expand Vocabulary Knowledge: Study a wider range of vocabulary, particularly words that may be more advanced or abstract. To get started check out our list of the 400 most commonly tested SAT words.
Diversify Reading Materials: Read a variety of materials, including scientific articles, literary works, and cultural essays. Check out our free list of commonly-tested literature to improve your reading comprehension skills.
Take Practice Tests Under Timed Conditions: Take full-length, timed practice tests to improve your pacing and time management during the real exam.