Secretary Linda McMahon's "National Call to Action" asks every U.S. college to publish, by year's end, a public statement on how it keeps admissions merit-based and transparent. It's voluntary — but it isn't nothing.
On Monday, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon issued a "National Call to Action to University Presidents and Governing Boards," asking every U.S. college to publicly commit to reforms across seven areas before the end of 2026. The three-page letter asks schools to post a "statement of principle" prominently on their websites covering: transparency and merit in admissions; free speech and open inquiry; intellectual pluralism; affordability, value, and student outcomes; academic rigor in the age of AI; safeguarding research from foreign influence; and "American interests."
On admissions specifically, schools are asked to explain how they will keep decisions merit-based and fully compliant with recent case law on race-conscious admissions. The request is voluntary — the letter sets no enforcement process, does not require statements to be submitted to the Department, and names no penalty for schools that ignore it — though officials framed compliance as an "essential first step" toward restoring public trust. Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, drew a contrast with an earlier, more coercive "compact" the administration circulated, which most universities declined to sign: "Unlike the compact, which was a gun-to-the-head ultimatum, this is an invitation to a conversation."
This letter will not change how a single application gets read this cycle.
No enforcement mechanism. No deadline penalty. No requirement that a college even respond. If you were hoping for a rule change on race, essays, or holistic review, this is not it.
So why should you care?
Because "voluntary" does not mean invisible. Admissions offices normally hide behind the phrase "holistic review" and say almost nothing concrete about how it works. A wave of colleges now has a reason to put, in writing, what "merit-based" actually means on their campus — and some will say a lot more than others.
Check the admissions pages of schools on your list again in November and December. Some will publish specific, concrete criteria. Others will post vague, recycled boilerplate — or nothing at all. That gap is real information about how each school operates and how much legal exposure it thinks it has.
Read the language literally, not as marketing copy. "Merit-based" is doing a lot of work in this letter, and it means different things depending on whether a school still weighs legacy, athletics, essays, or demonstrated interest heavily.
Yale, UCLA, and more than a dozen medical schools have already faced DOJ inquiries into race in admissions this year. If any of those are on your list, their response to this letter is worth reading closely — a detailed public commitment now doubles as a legal defense document, and a school that stays quiet is telling you something too.
Nothing here bans holistic review or rewrites what you submit this fall. This is a political pressure campaign wearing the clothes of a voluntary invitation. Treat whatever statements show up by December as messaging first, and weigh them against what a school's actual admitted-class data shows — not the other way around.
The Department gave every college until New Year's Eve to answer a question applicants have been asking for years: what does "merit" actually mean here? Read the answers when they land. Don't take the acceptance letter's word for it.
Enter your grades and test scores to see your odds at colleges across the country.
Check my chances →