Inferences and conclusions: reading practice set 2
Combine clues from the text, then choose the conclusion that needs the fewest extra assumptions. This set contains 12 original Paragraph Comprehension exercises.
Connect two stated facts to reach a supported conclusion.
Reject an answer that turns a limited claim into an absolute one.
A method you can repeat
Underline the facts relevant to the question.
Combine those facts without adding a new event, motive, or rule.
Check strong words such as always, only, and everyone against the passage.
Worked example: follow the evidence
Read: The coordinator placed parcel K on the westbound rack. The loading plan assigned every parcel on that rack to van 2. The crew loaded parcel K according to the plan.
What can be concluded from the passage?
Supported answer: Parcel K was loaded into van 2.
Why it fits: K was on the westbound rack, all parcels on that rack were assigned to van 2, and the crew followed the plan for K.
Tempting wrong answer: Van 2 carried only westbound parcels.
Why it fails: The plan tells us where westbound parcels went. It does not tell us whether van 2 also carried other parcels. “Every westbound parcel went to van 2” does not mean “every parcel in van 2 was westbound.”
Before each answer: Ask: “Which facts support this answer, and what would I have to assume?”
Inferences and conclusions questions and explanations
Work through one question at a time. Explain your approach, check the worked answer, then move on. Use scratch paper for calculations.
0 of 12 checked · 0 correct.
Progress is saved in this browser. These original study questions do not produce an official AFQT score.
Question 1: Inference
Question 1 · Inference · hard
Oren had checked his sister’s new address against her last letter before writing it on the invitation. Inside, he described the evening warmly and mentioned the chair he had already set aside for her. He read the invitation twice, folded it, and placed it beside the outgoing mail. When the collection cart rattled past the window, he reached for the envelope but did not open the door. Later, hearing someone on the stairs, he slipped it into a drawer. That night he moved the extra chair closer to the table. The envelope remained where he had hidden it, still without a stamp.
Which conclusion is best supported by Oren’s actions?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: C. He appears to want his sister there but remains hesitant about sending the invitation.
The warm invitation and reserved chair suggest a wish for his sister to attend, while the missed collection and hidden, unstamped envelope show hesitation about communicating that wish. The passage does not identify the exact cause of his hesitation. He checked the address, and the passage reports no later discovery of an error. The extra chair remains part of his preparations, and no cancellation is described. The unstamped envelope remains hidden in his drawer.
Question 2: Inference
Question 2 · Inference · easy
For most of April, Niko’s diary gives a short weather entry each evening. Rain, clear skies, and strong winds all receive a few words. The pages for April 12 through April 16 contain no weather notes. On April 11, however, Niko wrote that he was leaving the diary at home while visiting his cousin. His next entry begins, “Back this afternoon.” A later reader noticed the blank pages and wondered what the weather had been like during those days.
Which conclusion about the blank pages is best supported?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: D. They do not establish what the weather was like while Niko was away.
Niko left the diary at home while traveling, giving a reason for the missing observations. Without entries for those dates, the reader cannot infer particular weather conditions from the blanks. A lack of entries does not establish clear weather. The opening says that clear skies as well as rain and strong winds receive entries. The pages are described as blank, not missing or removed.
Question 3: Inference
Question 3 · Inference · medium
When Sal returned home, the guest-room bed had been made and the small suitcase was gone. The coat that had hung beside the door was gone too. On the kitchen table lay the spare house key, placed on a clean saucer. There was no note. Sal checked the message board, where guests usually wrote their travel plans, but it still held only an old shopping list. He put the key back in its drawer and left the evening meal for one warming on the stove.
Which conclusion is most strongly supported?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: B. The guest probably left, but the passage does not reveal where the guest went.
The missing suitcase and coat, made bed, and returned key support the conclusion that the guest has left. The absent note and unchanged message board leave the destination unspecified. No disagreement or reason for leaving is stated. The returned key and missing belongings suggest departure, and no promised return is mentioned. The message board contains only an old shopping list.
Question 4: Inference
Question 4 · Inference · medium
Mara had revised the harbor description until every sentence pleased her. Yet when she read the chapter aloud, the description stopped the argument just as it was gathering force. Her editor suggested removing it. Mara agreed, though she copied the paragraph into a separate folder before deleting it from the chapter. A month later, she used two of its images in an essay about another subject. Asked whether the original paragraph had been bad writing, she said that it had been doing the wrong job in the wrong place.
What can reasonably be inferred from Mara’s decision?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: D. A passage can have value even when it does not belong in a particular piece of writing.
Mara removes the paragraph because of its function in that chapter, while preserving and later reusing parts of it. That combination distinguishes a passage’s quality or value from its suitability for one location. Mara likes the sentences and later reuses some of their images. The stated problem is interruption of the argument, not factual accuracy. Mara later uses images from the paragraph in another essay.
Question 5: Inference
Question 5 · Inference · medium
As the train passed a roof painted with three broad stripes, Nara closed her book and reached for her bag. The station had not yet been announced. Across the aisle, a passenger glanced at his watch and asked whether they were late. Nara did not look at the clock. She pointed instead to a line of poplars coming into view and said, “The platform is just beyond those.” A moment later, the conductor named the stop, and Nara stood ready beside her seat.
What most likely helped Nara anticipate the stop?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: B. Recognition of features along the route.
Nara reacts to the striped roof and identifies the platform’s location relative to the poplars. These actions suggest recognition of the surroundings. The passenger asks about lateness but does not report a delay or identify the stop. The passage says the station had not yet been announced when she began packing. She does not look at the clock and instead points to visible landmarks.
Question 6: Inference
Question 6 · Inference · easy
The corner of the alcove looked square to Imani. She was ready to cut a shelf that would fit neatly between the two walls. Her uncle, a carpenter, handed her a measuring tool and asked her to check the angle first. “A shelf can leave a gap in a corner that looks perfectly ordinary,” he said. Imani measured the corner before marking the final shape on the board.
Why does the carpenter ask Imani to measure the angle?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: C. Its appearance may not be precise enough to ensure a close fit.
The warning about gaps contrasts a corner’s ordinary appearance with the exact shape needed for a fitted shelf. The intended shelf should fit the alcove; no requirement for extra width is given. The passage describes checking the existing angle, not relocating walls. She measures before marking and cutting the final shape.
Question 7: Inference
Question 7 · Inference · medium
The Bridge Bookshop now stands on a busy square, three streets from the river. Above its new doorway hangs the narrow sign that once faced the old stone bridge. When a customer suggested repainting it with a name better suited to the square, the owner pointed to letters from readers who had known the shop for years. Several began, “I hope this still reaches the Bridge.” The owner repaired the sign’s cracked corner but kept both the name and the painted bridge beneath it.
What does the owner’s response most strongly suggest?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: C. The old name still provides a recognizable identity after the move.
The letters show that longtime readers still identify the business by its old name, which helps explain keeping that name at the new address. Keeping the sign does not establish a plan to move back. The passage places the old bridge by the river and gives no bridge in the square. No required route to the new location is described.
Question 8: Inference
Question 8 · Inference · easy
On three quiet mornings, Tomas saw a small bird feeding beneath the orchard’s farthest tree. During the next two mornings, workers used noisy equipment nearby, and he did not see it. After the workers left, he noticed the bird beneath the same tree again. His notebook recorded the times and the activity in the orchard. It did not record where the bird had been while the workers were present.
Which conclusion is best supported?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: B. The bird’s absence from Tomas’s view does not establish that it had left the orchard.
The observations show when the bird was visible, but its unobserved location is unknown. Not seeing it is insufficient to conclude that it left the orchard. It is seen again beneath the same tree after the workers leave. No feeding benefit from the equipment is described. The notebook does not record where it was during that period.
Question 9: Inference
Question 9 · Inference · hard
At the pottery exhibition, visitors gathered around a bowl covered with carved vines. The judges’ notes praised the carving but also recorded that the bowl rocked when set on a flat board. The prize went to an undecorated bowl. Beside its number, the notes mentioned a steady base, an even rim, and a weight comfortable to lift. A visitor concluded that the judges must dislike ornament. Yet the exhibition record showed that the previous winner, chosen by the same judges, had a richly patterned surface. Its entry also received favorable comments about balance and finish. The current winner’s maker said only that she had spent many hours refining the bowl’s form.
Which conclusion best fits the evidence about the judges?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: D. They appear to value functional execution without treating ornament itself as a disadvantage.
The current decision and comments support attention to stability, finish, and handling. Praise for carving and the earlier patterned winner prevent a justified inference that decoration itself is disfavored. The notes concern the bowls’ qualities, and no preference for low visitor attention is stated. They praise the current carved bowl’s decoration; the evidence does not show a newly adopted rejection of it. An undecorated bowl wins after a patterned one, contradicting such a surface-design requirement.
Question 10: Inference
Question 10 · Inference · medium
Three boxes on the workbench had the same outside length and width. To make each lid sit closely, Belen had trimmed the inside edge of each box by hand and fitted a lid to that particular opening. She marked matching numbers beneath the lids and inside the boxes. After an assistant mixed them up, one lid rested neatly on its numbered box but tilted on another. The assistant measured the outside lengths again and found no difference. Belen pointed to the inner edges, where the small adjustments had been made.
Why could a lid fit one box but not another with the same outside measurements?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: B. The individually adjusted inner openings need not have identical shapes.
The equal measurements concern the exteriors. Individual trimming changes the inner edges that determine how each fitted lid sits. The numbers identify the intended pairings; they do not alter dimensions. The assistant remeasured outside lengths, not the individually trimmed inner edges. One lid rests neatly on its matching box; tilting indicates a mismatch here.
Question 11: Inference
Question 11 · Inference · hard
Mira played the old tune briskly while the guests found their seats. Near the window, her grandfather began humming, but his voice entered a little behind each phrase. Mira glanced toward him and repeated the opening more slowly. She kept the same notes, looking up whenever his humming paused. When he joined the next phrase on time, she continued at the slower pace. After he stopped to greet an arriving friend, Mira played a quick run of notes and moved into the next tune without hesitation. No one had asked her to change the program, and the gathering continued around the music.
What is the best-supported explanation for Mira’s temporary change of pace?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: D. She was probably making it easier for her grandfather to join the tune.
The timing of the slowdown, Mira’s repeated glances, and her continued slower pace when the humming catches up point to accommodating her grandfather. Her later fluent playing weakens an explanation based on forgetting the music. She keeps the notes unchanged and later plays fluently without hesitation; her adjustments track his humming. The friend arrives after the slower playing has begun, and no request to replace the tune is described. The continued attention to the humming and the later quick playing connect the temporary adjustment more closely to her grandfather.
Question 12: Inference
Question 12 · Inference · hard
A small dull rectangle remained near the edge of the museum’s newly polished display panel. Before work began, photographs showed a uniformly dull surface, with no separate rectangle visible. In the work record, a plan outlined the small area and labeled it R; the adjacent polished area was labeled P. The completed checklist listed polishing as finished, with no return visit scheduled to complete it. A later page provided spaces for color readings at R and P after three months and again after six months. Visitors noticed the contrast, although the panel’s central image remained unobstructed and the label discussed only the history of that image.
What is the strongest inference about the dull rectangle?
Worked answer and explanation
Answer: A. It was probably retained to provide a comparison with the polished surface over time.
The planned boundary, completion record, and paired future readings together support an intentional comparison area. The inference combines those clues rather than assuming any unpolished patch is accidental. The earlier photographs show no separate patch, while the plan deliberately outlines the area before later readings. The checklist treats polishing as complete and lists no return visit to finish it. The central image remains unobstructed, and the rectangle is near the edge rather than identified as the image’s sole clear area.
After this set: choose one missed answer and name the exact mistake: an added assumption, a lost condition, a detail mistaken for the main idea, or another mismatch with the text. Explain the correction in your own words before trying the next set.