← CLT Prep

CLT: Absolute value, intervals and the number of solutions

Translate absolute values into distances and sign cases before counting or solving.

Updated October 2, 2026

Overview

An absolute value tells you distance from zero, so its output cannot be negative. That simple meaning supports two different strategies: convert a distance bound into an interval, or split a formula where an expression changes sign. The goal is to choose the strategy that reveals the structure. You will use both to count integer solutions, simplify an expression on a restricted interval, and determine when a parameter produces two positive roots.

Turn a strict distance bound into an open interval

In |2x − 3| < 7, the expression 2x − 3 must lie less than seven units from zero. Write both sides of that information: −7 < 2x − 3 < 7. Adding 3 throughout and dividing by 2 gives −2 < x < 5. Neither endpoint belongs to the solution set because the original comparison is strict.

The question asks for integers rather than the length of the interval. The eligible integers are −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, so the answer is six. A quick sketch of an open interval can prevent two different errors: counting the boundary values and confusing the distance between boundaries with the number of integers between them. After counting, substitute a boundary into the original expression. Both boundaries give an absolute value of 7, confirming why they are excluded rather than counted.

Let the supplied interval decide each sign

For −3 < a < 0, consider |a| + |a + 3|. The first quantity inside an absolute value is negative; the second is positive. Therefore |a| = −a and |a + 3| = a + 3. Adding gives −a + a + 3 = 3. The variable disappears because every point in this interval has a fixed total distance from the two endpoints.

Do not remove both bars using the same rule merely because the expressions look similar. The sign of a does not determine the sign of a + 3 without considering the shift. The alternative 2a + 3 treats a as nonnegative, while −2a − 3 treats both expressions as negative. Writing the sign of each interior expression before simplifying is a small step that exposes these errors. It also scales to longer expressions whose different absolute values change behavior at different points.

Find the shape before solving for a parameter

Now study 2|x − 1| + |x − 5| = k. Its sign changes occur at x = 1 and x = 5. To the left of 1, the expression is 2(1 − x) + (5 − x) = 7 − 3x. Between 1 and 5 it is 2(x − 1) + (5 − x) = x + 3. To the right of 5 it becomes 3x − 7.

The function decreases toward x = 1 and increases after it, so its minimum value is 4. A horizontal line of height k crosses the graph twice only when k > 4. The requirement that both intersections have positive x adds another restriction. On the left branch the root is (7 − k)/3, which is positive precisely when k < 7. Together these conditions give 4 < k < 7. At k = 4 the two roots merge; at k = 7 the left root is zero and fails strict positivity.

Check boundaries and carry the method forward

The tempting interval 4 < k < 8 recognizes the minimum but places the second cutoff incorrectly. The cutoff comes from the graph’s value at x = 0, because positivity is lost there; it does not come from a sign-change point such as x = 5. This distinction is central to parameter questions: different restrictions can come from different features of the same graph.

When a new problem asks for a number of solutions, resist immediately solving every algebraic branch. First identify turning points, minimum values and the requested domain. Then use equations only where they locate a boundary or intersection. For ordinary absolute-value inequalities, use the same discipline on a smaller scale: identify whether the distance is less than or greater than a threshold, preserve strict endpoints, and check whether the requested answer is a set, a count or a sum. In practice, explain which condition rules out each endpoint before selecting an interval.

Apply the method to a new case

A sensor position x must be within 3 units of 2, but more than 1 unit from −1. Which real positions are allowed? Translate the two distances before calculating: |x − 2| ≤ 3 gives −1 ≤ x ≤ 5, while |x + 1| > 1 gives x < −2 or x > 0. A position must meet both requirements, so intersect the first interval with each branch of the second. The left branch has no overlap; the right branch leaves 0 < x ≤ 5. Keeping the union of the two original conditions would accept positions that satisfy only one requirement. Check the endpoints in the original distances: x = 0 is exactly 1 unit from −1 and is excluded, whereas x = 5 is exactly 3 units from 2 and is included. A point such as x = 2 provides a quick interior check.

Practice question

Loading saved practice…

In your own words

How would you spot another distance inequality integer count question, and what would you do first?

Back to the course

Related Resources